Constructivism
in Practice
This week, we
explored several related instructional strategies. The thread they had in common was their
relevance for constructionist practice in the classroom. Constructionism is a
theory of learning based on the studies of Vygotsky, Piaget and Papert. Orey
(Laureate Education, Inc., 2011) summarizes this approach as being the process
of building “an external artifact or
something they can share with others”. He notes that constructivism is usually
regarded as more of an epistemology, and is based on the idea that, because of
our individuality and unique experiences, the knowledge base we form in our own
minds is distinctive.
This diagram is from edweb.sdsu.edu .
The website above explains that the
main idea of constructivism in teaching is that we should spend most of our
time correcting and clarifying misconceptions. They state “Additional
constructivist strategies include presenting others' viewpoints, promoting
dialogue, and emphasizing conceptual understanding rather than rote learning”. These strategies
are especially important when you consider the specific needs of the 21st
century learner.
Proponents of project-based learning feel
that it provides a framework for utilising highly complex problem-solving
skills using “both fundamental skills and 21st century skills” (Edutopia, accessed 2012). In combination with a well-structured social
component, and a driving question that “initiates and focusses” the inquiry (Miller,
in Edutopia, accessed 2012), this kind of learning embodies the artifact
creation espoused by constructionists.
In much the
same way, the strategy of generating and testing hypotheses explained by Pitler
(Pitler,
Hubbell, Kuhn, & Malenoski, 2007) results in the kind
of analysis of data and personal involvement in product that guarantees high
involvement by students. Artifacts, or
products, that are produced and shared under these conditions become a valuable
part of the schema of the students that create them.
One example of a very useful tool for creating an inquiry
or project is the webquest. The original proponent of the webquest, Bernie
Dodge, describes web quests as follows: "an
inquiry-oriented activity in which most or all of the information used by
learners is drawn from the Web.” According to Dodge, this kind of activity is
an excellent use of time because it is focussed, it results in learners using
information as opposed to searching for it, and, most importantly, it supports “ learners' thinking at the levels of
analysis, synthesis and evaluation."
You can find out more about web
quests on this site: www.literacy.uconn.edu/56webqu.htm
I have
not used web quests in the past, but I have used other forms of inquiry-based
learning. I look forward to trying a webquest, and in fact have selected a
poetry one for my grade fives to try out next week. Constructionism in practice
is not new to me, but the knowledge I am gaining in the arena of technology will
help me to improve the delivery of information and the access the students have
to content and to tools for creating those products.
References.
Edutopia. (n.d.).
Retrieved November 2012, from www.edutopia.org:
http://www.edutopia.org/project-based-learning
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2011). Program four:
Behaviorist learning theory [Video webcast]. Bridging learning theory, instruction and technology. Retrieved
from http://laureate.ecollege.com/ec/crs/default.learn?CourseID=5700267&CPURL=laureate.ecollege.com&Survey=1&47=2594577&ClientNodeID=984650&coursenav=0&bhcp=1
Miller, A.
(n.d.). Edutopia. Retrieved November 2012, from www.edutopia.org:
http://www.edutopia.org/blog/pbl-how-to-write-driving-questions-andrew-miller
Pitler, H.,
Hubbell, E., Kuhn, M., & Malenoski, K. (2007). Using Technology with
Classroom Instruction that Works. Denver: McREL.
Hi Lisa,
ReplyDeleteYou say Bernie Dodge promotes web quests as being an excellent use of time because they are focused. Well, maybe in comparison to dropping the students in the middle of the library, with no computers.
On my first day of this long-term sub position, the students were working on a web quest looking up information about the history and culture of Spain. What I found interesting was that they were typing the questions word for word into the Google search field. Then they were using the first bit of reasonable-looking information they came across. For example; when they typed "How far is it from Spain to Africa", Google was coming up with a distance from Madrid to Africa(a city?)in Tanzania. Some 7,000+ miles, complete with a map diagram. When in fact the distance they were looking for was the width of the Strait of Gibraltar.
I think the answer might be to restrict web quests to databases and spend more time teaching scudents to be critical of the information they find. What do you think?
Hi Tracy,
ReplyDeleteI think definitely students NEED to have practice in how to do a webquest before they are turned loose- pretty much the same as anything else! And part of it should certainly be how to ask a sensible question/ do a productive search.
Maybe the place to start is having them click on links we have prepared in order to answer a question? And then explaining why you asked the question that way? The webquest I am going to try is kind of like that. They are set loose within specific links to poetry sites rather than just doing a general search.
Lisa
Hi Lisa,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your blog posting, it was very detailed and thoroughly explained Constructiveness theory. I actually began to use Web-quest in my Undergrad, we had a long unit from watching videos on them, how students worked with them in classrooms and we created our own. It was a very fun unit to me, and it is amazing to see how involved the students get and even our class did. Web-quest are great to because each student can play a particular role in creating them, and they have more options that meet the needs of all learners.
In answer to your question about the Circuits for 1st graders, I believe the first graders should be fine working with very basic circuits. I would defiantly work as a large group first modeling to the classroom how to create different ways they will work. Then have students work in small groups, and just observe them as they work. If you see they may not be understanding, you can always have the students finish in a large group setting. Good Luck!
Hi Jenny,
ReplyDeleteThanks so much for your feedback about the circuits lesson. It has actually been put of until this Tuesday... hopefully it will go well! I found a cute teachertube song to start the lesson off.
Have you ever done a webquest with your younger learners?
Lisa
When I was still in college, we were required to take an Educational Technology class as part of the major. It was during this class that I became introduced with WebQuests and their usefullness in engaging students, helping them differentiate between fact from fiction and to help them learn in a new format. I suggest finding the WebQuest about the Pacific Northwest Tree Octopus and using it as a way to help guide students in the "proper" way of finding information on the Internet and how to successfully use correct information.
ReplyDeleteHi Cynthia,
DeleteThanks for the idea! I have not looked that one up but remember hearing about it in an earlier course.
Lisa
Hi Lisa,
ReplyDeleteI have done one in a Third grade class. But not the young ones. I make a power point every week to introduce new themes with fun images and graphics.
Hi Jenny,
DeleteThat sounds like fun! What sorts of themes have gone over especially well?
Lisa
PS The circuits lesson went well! They even predeicted that two batteries would make the bulb brighter!!! :)
Hey Lisa,
ReplyDeleteYour blog page looks great! You have been putting in some work on this, it's very inviting. In fact, is this not in itself an example of Constructionism? You learned something while creating an authentic item to share with others!
Josh
Hi Josh,
DeleteThanks!
And, I think you are absolutely right. I am constructing something that is enhancing my understanding, and I am learning from the process, not just the end product. In addition, I think it is an example of social constructionism as I am certainly learning from others, and connectivism as well as I really do think are building a network here. Hopefully we will stay in contact even after this course has ended.
Regards,
Lisa